Current:Home > MyKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -LegacyCapital
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-15 12:42:52
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (19353)
Related
- Sonya Massey's family keeps eyes on 'full justice' one month after shooting
- 2 Navy SEALs missing after falling into water during mission off Somalia's coast
- NFL schedule today: Everything to know about playoff games on Jan. 15
- Deal reached on short-term funding bill to avert government shutdown, sources say
- A Georgia governor’s latest work after politics: a children’s book on his cats ‘Veto’ and ‘Bill’
- Jared Goff leads Lions to first playoff win in 32 years, 24-23 over Matthew Stafford and the Rams
- Former high-ranking Philadelphia police commander to be reinstated after arbitrator’s ruling
- Haley fares best against Biden as Republican contenders hold national leads
- Former Milwaukee hotel workers charged with murder after video shows them holding down Black man
- Texas jeweler and dog killed in targeted hit involving son, daughter-in-law
Ranking
- 51-year-old Andy Macdonald puts on Tony Hawk-approved Olympic skateboard showing
- Deal reached on short-term funding bill to avert government shutdown, sources say
- 2 Navy SEALs missing after falling into water during mission off Somalia's coast
- Phoenix police shoot, run over man they mistake for domestic violence suspect
- Mega Millions winning numbers for August 6 drawing: Jackpot climbs to $398 million
- Lenny Kravitz Is Totally Ready to Rock Daughter Zoë Kravitz and Channing Tatum's Wedding
- Brunei’s newlywed Prince Mateen and his commoner wife to be feted at the end of lavish celebrations
- Biden administration warns it will take action if Texas does not stop blocking federal agents from U.S. border area
Recommendation
What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
Monster Murders: Inside the Controversial Fascination With Jeffrey Dahmer
Horse racing in China’s gaming hub of Macao to end in April, after over 40 years
Horoscopes Today, January 13, 2024
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
New York governor says Bills game won't be postponed again; Steelers en route to Buffalo
'Fargo' finale: Season 5 cast; where and when to watch Episode 10 on TV, streaming
Live updates | Gaza death toll tops 24,000 as Israel strikes targets in north and south